Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
x635

Union: Study Shows Yonkers Firefighters At Disadvantage In High-Rise Blaze

13 posts in this topic

Union: Study Shows Yonkers Firefighters At Disadvantage In High-Rise Blaze

YONKERS, N.Y. – A new study shows Yonkers firefighters may be ill-equipped to handle blazes in high-rise buildings, according to union leaders

http://yonkers.dailyvoice.com/police-fire/union-study-shows-yonkers-firefighters-disadvantage-high-rise-blaze

1911 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



And then there are depts with no staffing and taller buildings..........We must be at a really big megabucksdisadvanage !

Bnechis likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And then there are depts with no staffing and taller buildings..........We must be at a really big megabucksdisadvanage !

Interesting how language works. At 1st reading I questioned how many "taller" 40 story buildings are in the county (outside WP & NR). But on rereading I get the "taller" buildings could be 6 story "highrise" cause they are taller than theother buildings in the community.

PCFD ENG58 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point here is that any standpipe equipped building whether 6 or 40 stories cannot be handled properly with current staffing. Yonkers has 4 per rig, 1 remains in street to supply system which in itself is difficult task for 1 member, the Officer and 2 firefighters are left to handle hose lay and one member must remain at standpipe valve to supply line. So in essence 2 are manning the line in a high rise fire, with the possibilty of long hallways and wind driven fires, plus not enough line carried into building by the 3 members. So yes Yonkers firefighters are at a big disadvantage in high rise operations. How long would it take for the 2nd engine to pair up and assist with line placement, this would add more members to facilitate stretch, but in some sections it may be a while for this to occur due to long responses. Union has some real issues here but is there an answer that allows high rise operations in Yonkers to be conducted safely.

tglass59, Bnechis, x129K and 1 other like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point here is that any standpipe equipped building whether 6 or 40 stories cannot be handled properly with current staffing. Yonkers has 4 per rig, 1 remains in street to supply system which in itself is difficult task for 1 member, the Officer and 2 firefighters are left to handle hose lay and one member must remain at standpipe valve to supply line. So in essence 2 are manning the line in a high rise fire, with the possibilty of long hallways and wind driven fires, plus not enough line carried into building by the 3 members. So yes Yonkers firefighters are at a big disadvantage in high rise operations. How long would it take for the 2nd engine to pair up and assist with line placement, this would add more members to facilitate stretch, but in some sections it may be a while for this to occur due to long responses. Union has some real issues here but is there an answer that allows high rise operations in Yonkers to be conducted safely.

I agree with everything you said. My point is that YFD is understaffed, but NR & WP are running with 3 per rig. when 1 remains in the street to pump. That leaves the officer and ff to lay hose from the standpipe to the fire apt. Now who mans the valve, the officer or the ff and what if the ff is a probie (do you send him in alone?).

In either case 1 in an IDLH atmospher is a problem.

The study shows that pairing up 2) 3 man units (6 members) is less effective than 5 man companies.

791075, SmokeyJoe and tglass59 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is whether or not management will increase staffing....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is whether or not management will increase staffing....

And the answer will be "no" to increased (unit) staffing.

helicopper likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is whether or not management will increase staffing....

I think most agencies would be happy just sustaining what they've got. It seems that every year they try to get away with cutting more and more. Pretty soon, EVERY cut takes it's toll!

antiquefirelt, Bnechis and JM15 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rigorous training, awareness, accountability and sheer luck probably are significant factors helping prevent firefighter fatalities due to reduced staffing for interior operations.

The current (under)manning levels are lunacy, expecting the first team of two guys to enter, search and suppress, and that's if everything goes according to plan.

Whatever happened to two-in-two-out? Are 2 guys going in without the same number of guys on ready-standby, behind them ?

Bnechis likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever happened to two-in-two-out? Are 2 guys going in without the same number of guys on ready-standby, behind them ?

The NYS courts just confirmed that it will cost you if you do not follow it.

They awarded $4.2 million to the widows & children of 2 firefighters, Because Buffalo fail to follow 2in / 2out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.