NYS Fire Service Accountabilty Bill

[Guest]

Does this only affect Long Island, or all of NYS?????? It's a shame there is nothing in here about response times.

New York Legislation Would Watch Over Long Island Departments

BY ELIZABETH MOORE. STAFF WRITER

Newsday (New York)

   

No more taxpayer-funded liquor at lavish fire installation dinners. Firefighter seminars in the Bahamas will have to be justified to the state. And most of New York's fire districts will be audited once a year, if lawmakers approve a detailed package of bills filed this week by Lindenhurst Assemb. Robert Sweeney and others.

Sweeney, chairman of the Assembly's Local Governments Committee, has been negotiating since January with fire service leaders and other state officials on the 13-bill package he hopes will help clean up the extravagant spending, mismanagement and weak oversight highlighted in Newsday's series in November on Long Island's volunteer fire system.

The package, which is expected to pass both houses this spring with volunteer support, is aimed at better accountability and more public involvement, Sweeney said.

"We know there's issues out there, and we know we all want to tackle them head on," he said, adding the Firemen's Association of the State of New York and other volunteer groups had actively cooperated. "They didn't want to cut and run."

Other Assembly sponsors included Patricia Eddington (D-Medford), Philip R. Ramos (D-Brentwood), Assembly Leader Paul Tokasz (D-Cheektowaga) and Marc Alessi (D-Manor Park).

All New York fire districts with more than $200,000 in revenue, which includes all but six on Long Island, would have to have annual independent audits, as school districts now do, filing those reports with the town and state. Fire districts could no longer create reserve funds to save up for buildings and trucks without putting their plans to a public vote. And the state comptroller could examine the books of not-for-profit fire companies, and not just the fire districts that raise money through taxes.

The measures also aim to cut down on what lawmakers termed "extremely extravagant" banquets and unnecessary travel spending. To send volunteers to Key Largo, Fla., for dive training, for instance, commissioners would have to certify that an in-state course wasn't available, and notify the state Office of Fire Prevention and Control. That agency would report annually to the governor listing all such trips.

Fire districts would be required to adopt codes of ethics and post them prominently. Fire company officials and line officers would have to disclose any financial interest in contracts, as district commissioners now do. Commissioners would be required to take financial training courses, and no-show commissioners would be subject to removal.

The measures also seek to improve public involvement. On the same day each October, all fire districts statewide would hold public budget hearings. No longer could districts schedule bond votes on religious holidays or the Friday before Labor Day: Special elections would have to be held on a Tuesday and timed to maximize turnout. And annual budget hearings and bond votes would be publicized not just in the small print of newspaper legal ads, but also on firehouse reader boards, town notice boards, and town and fire district Web sites.

Republican Sen. Kenneth LaValle, who filed three similar bills earlier this year, said he would work with Sens. Michael Balboni and Betty Little, Sweeney's Senate counterpart, to pass the package.

Volunteer officials agreed that changes are needed.

"The last few months have been difficult," said Ken Hoffarth, president of the state Association of Fire Districts. He questioned the practicality of requirements to report out-of-state travel to the state, but said he backed the package and hoped it would "restore the public's trust in our fire district officials."

The proposed fire fix

Highlights of Sweeney's "fire service accountability" bills:

Audits: Fire districts must hire independent auditors, as school districts do, and file the reports with town and the state.

Ethics: Fire districts must adopt ethics codes and more fire officials would have to disclose ties to companies doing business with the districts.

Buildings: Fire districts can't set up capital reserve funds without a public vote, after spelling out where the money would go.

Voters: An annual, statewide "fire district budget day" with public hearings. Hearings and special elections must be publicized on Web sites and reader boards.

Training: Mandatory state financial training for all fire commissioners.

Perks: Dinners and travel expenses must be "cost-effective and reasonable" and out-of-state training trips must be certified as necessary and reported to the state. No more taxpayer-funded alcohol.

Edited March 30, 2006 by EM2FD

[TRUCK6018 50]

Does this only affect Long Island, or all of NYS?????? It's a shame there is nothing in here about response times.

←

It would have to affect all of New York. It would be difficult to justify these measures to only two counties but not the rest of the state.

The bottom line is the districts that take advantage of their autonomous status need a wake up call! Audits and ethics are a great place to start. These districts should be held accountable for their spending and contractual agreements.

I do believe changing the capital reserve funding laws would hurt those district that do the right thing. To put the formation of these funds to public vote could hurt long term plans for apparatus replacement. Further more, it could lead to districts floating bonds that would otherwise have the money stashed away.

There already are accountability measures in this area:

1) Districts must post a permissive referendum in the legal ads to spend money from a capital reserve fund. This specifies a dollar cap and what it's going to be used for.

2) The purchases must go through a bidding process.

Ultimately, the few lawmakers (those on Long Island) that are pushing for these changes will have to convince their counterparts representing the rest of the state. It should be interesting to see what bills survive and what ones get trashed.

[dadbo46 50]

Maybe a bit overboard, but, it's about time !!