I too try to stay out of this, but have to step in when false information is said to serve one's agenda
Alpineruner,
You couldn't be any further from the truth. Lets be honest here about how this incident would have been "if the mayors plan had been enacted" First, this particular call was around 8:00 Pm. According to the mayors plan there would have been only two paid personnel responding not three. More importantly did we forget what was wrong with the old system? If the mayors plan was enacted this incident would have been no different than that typical of prior to 2008.
With two paid guys staffing the firehouse do you really think those three guys would have been staffing the firehouse!!
If TOR members weren't promised paid jobs, and if there wasn't a rat race to go to calls, lots of calls to put individual job seeking members first in line for a job, do you think that those three guys would have likely been staffing the firehouse??
Do you really think that if the mayors plan was enacted, the off duty paid guys of NSFD would be staffing firehouses and responding to calls???
Prior to 2008 how many out of the roughly 44 paid drivers in BFD, GFD, TOR & LRFD would respond to calls as volunteers when they were off duty?
Agendas Huh?
If there where truly enough volunteers to consistently provide coverage then why do they need to have two- three paid guys staffing the firehouse??
If there are plenty of volunteers why not just a single paid driver like the old, old days?